It’s no secret that I am coming into the motorcycling world a complete noob, not to mention no prior deep interest in mechanical terminology like ‘horse power’ or ‘cylinders’. To me if a machine works, use it, if it doesn’t, get a new one.
Suddenly with this project, all this stuff matters, and not only that, advise given is to try out lots of bikes and get experience and build a preference. Erm, with no license, this is hard to do. So I have followed a journey on cold facts, and interestingly, in many respects, I am not sure that preference would have helped me make the right choice, only an emotional one.
The first thing I learnt very quickly was that the bigger the numbers the bigger the bike. I also learnt very quickly that not all motorbikes have chains, like bicycles. This was a fact I latched on to quickly, because I know about chains on a bicycle, and when it comes off, it can be a fiddle to get back on – heaven knows what that must be like on a motorbike! The other type of motorbike has a drive shaft which sounds much simpler to me, safer, and less likely to go wrong.
So looking at bikes with drive shafts, I immediately honed in on two motorbikes that are designed as adventure touring bikes with this configuration – the BMW 1200GS and the Ural (all their bikes have this configuration).
You really couldn’t get to bikes more opposite on the spectrum of what is available. Its like saying that the choice is between a Bentley and Lada car (if Lada’s where still in production) literally. The BMW 1200GS has every comfort and convenience accounted for on those hazardous roads around the world. The Ural is a solid Russian bike that hasn’t changed much since inception in the 1930s, it was built to last. It has only been in the last year or so that they have included fuel injection as standard, a modern technology that now means that ‘software’ has finally made it onto the Ural. Thankfully the Ural, much like Skoda did in the past, has looked outside of its knowledge base for these upgrades, and in this case I believe that the fuel injection has been supplied by Ducati.
So there we have it. Large choice, suddenly diminished to 2 bikes. I chose the Ural.
1- Sidecar fitting on the BMW changes the standard structure of the bike so that it is no longer supported by warranty. This is actually a very important point. I know many say that the BMW will never break down, especially to the degree where BMW would have to get involved. Personally, with my daughter in tow, I’m not sure I want to take that risk and ride into Africa on belief alone.
The Ural on the other hand is specifically designed with the sidecar, and with the fuel injection upgrade, they now provide warranty cover. All thumbs up with Ural.
2 – Fix-ability is a major issue with the BMW. The motorbike has so much technology now that really you need to have diagnosis tools, software programming degree, and 5 years working in BMW to even have a chance of fixing anything more major than a flat tyre on the road.
The Ural, however, is still as simple as it can be. Not as simple as the carburetor version, but you still have a good chance off fixing most problems with the bike on the road, and if you can’t do it yourself, you can probably find someone with a spanner who can. Strike 2 to Ural.
There are other minor graces of the Ural over the BMW, but needless to say, to me, travelling with my daughter in some remoter areas of the planet, my confidence will be much higher with the Ural. Ok, so it isn’t fast, it isn’t sexy, and it doesn’t have 5 suspension options controlled by a panel on the handle bars, but it works, it gets from A to B, is a lot of fun and if it lets me down, there is a real chance of being able to fix it.
Thank you to everyone who has given me advise over the last few months! I really couldn’t have gone through this process with out your input. If the sidecar wasn’t in play, I think the BMW would have been my top choice.
AdventureWithAutism 